786
loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal of H.E. Chao Erh-hsun from the Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an interview on 11th March H.E. stated that H.E. Chang Chih-tung desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy, Sheng Kuei-lung, had taken over charge.
Subsequently, however (28 March), it was intimated to the Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so long as the outstanding bonds of the American China Development Company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was not open to H.E. Chang to negotiate for a British loan for the construction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in view of the letter given to the Société d'Etudes by H.E. Sheng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential right to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government were debarred from entering upon negotiations with British capitalists. This protest would appear to have caused H.E. Sheng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan.
Referring to the Belgian protest it is to be observed that the alleged preferential right given by H.E. Sheng in the letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective only (1) in case the American China Development Company's provisional contract "should not become a definitive one" — which it did — and (2) that in the agreement made between H.E. Chang and the American China Development Company on 26th August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construction rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the fact that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already issued by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese Government should re-enter absolutely upon all its rights and privileges in connection with this railway, admitting only a liability to pay the interest and principal of the said bonds whenever due. The American China Development Company's rights and powers were therefore definitely restored to China.
})
786
loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal
1.E.Chao Erh-haun from th Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an
rview on 11th March H.E. stated that H..Chang chih Tung
desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy,
en Kuei-lung, had taken over charge.
Subsequently, however(28 March), it was intimated to
Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so
as the outstanding bonds of the American China Develop-
company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was
open to F.F.Chang to negotiate fora Fritish loan for the
struction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in
of the letter given to the Societé d'Etudes by H.F.
ng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential
ht to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government
debarred from entering upon negotiations with Pritich
italists. This protest would appear to have caused .E.
ng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan.
Referring to the Pelgian protest it is to be observed
that the alleged preferential right given by F.E.Sheng in
letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective
y in case the American China Development Company's pro-
ional contract "should not become a definitive one" →
ich it did - and (2) that in the agreement made between
.Chang and the American China Development Company on
August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construc-
n rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the
At that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already
d by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese
ernment should reenter absolutely upon all its rights and
ivileges in connection with this railway, admitting only
@liability to pay the interest and princip 1 of the anid
ads whenever due. The American China Development Company's
ts and powers were therefore definitely restored to
China
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.