CO129-351 - Public Offices - 1908 — Page 793

CO129 Colonial Office Hong Kong Records 理藩院香港檔案 All AI Reviewed

786

loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal of H.E. Chao Erh-hsun from the Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an interview on 11th March H.E. stated that H.E. Chang Chih-tung desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy, Sheng Kuei-lung, had taken over charge.

Subsequently, however (28 March), it was intimated to the Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so long as the outstanding bonds of the American China Development Company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was not open to H.E. Chang to negotiate for a British loan for the construction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in view of the letter given to the Société d'Etudes by H.E. Sheng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential right to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government were debarred from entering upon negotiations with British capitalists. This protest would appear to have caused H.E. Sheng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan.

Referring to the Belgian protest it is to be observed that the alleged preferential right given by H.E. Sheng in the letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective only (1) in case the American China Development Company's provisional contract "should not become a definitive one" — which it did — and (2) that in the agreement made between H.E. Chang and the American China Development Company on 26th August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construction rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the fact that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already issued by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese Government should re-enter absolutely upon all its rights and privileges in connection with this railway, admitting only a liability to pay the interest and principal of the said bonds whenever due. The American China Development Company's rights and powers were therefore definitely restored to China.

Edit History

2026-06-06 11:58:33 · NVIDIA / meta/llama-4-maverick-17b-128e-instruct
Live
View comparison
AI Proofread
786 loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal of H.E. Chao Erh-hsun from the Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an interview on 11th March H.E. stated that H.E. Chang Chih-tung desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy, Sheng Kuei-lung, had taken over charge. Subsequently, however (28 March), it was intimated to the Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so long as the outstanding bonds of the American China Development Company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was not open to H.E. Chang to negotiate for a British loan for the construction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in view of the letter given to the Société d'Etudes by H.E. Sheng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential right to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government were debarred from entering upon negotiations with British capitalists. This protest would appear to have caused H.E. Sheng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan. Referring to the Belgian protest it is to be observed that the alleged preferential right given by H.E. Sheng in the letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective only (1) in case the American China Development Company's provisional contract "should not become a definitive one" which it did and (2) that in the agreement made between H.E. Chang and the American China Development Company on 26th August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construction rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the fact that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already issued by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese Government should re-enter absolutely upon all its rights and privileges in connection with this railway, admitting only a liability to pay the interest and principal of the said bonds whenever due. The American China Development Company's rights and powers were therefore definitely restored to China.
Baseline (Original)
}) 786 loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal 1.E.Chao Erh-haun from th Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an rview on 11th March H.E. stated that H..Chang chih Tung desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy, en Kuei-lung, had taken over charge. Subsequently, however(28 March), it was intimated to Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so as the outstanding bonds of the American China Develop- company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was open to F.F.Chang to negotiate fora Fritish loan for the struction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in of the letter given to the Societé d'Etudes by H.F. ng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential ht to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government debarred from entering upon negotiations with Pritich italists. This protest would appear to have caused .E. ng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan. Referring to the Pelgian protest it is to be observed that the alleged preferential right given by F.E.Sheng in letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective y in case the American China Development Company's pro- ional contract "should not become a definitive one" ich it did - and (2) that in the agreement made between .Chang and the American China Development Company on August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construc- n rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the At that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already d by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese ernment should reenter absolutely upon all its rights and ivileges in connection with this railway, admitting only @liability to pay the interest and princip 1 of the anid ads whenever due. The American China Development Company's ts and powers were therefore definitely restored to China
2026-06-06 11:58:33 · Baseline
View content

})

786

loan facilitated. At this juncture occurred the removal

1.E.Chao Erh-haun from th Wuchang Viceroyalty and at an

rview on 11th March H.E. stated that H..Chang chih Tung

desired to postpone negotiations until the new Viceroy,

en Kuei-lung, had taken over charge.

Subsequently, however(28 March), it was intimated to

Chinese Government by the Belgian Minister that so

as the outstanding bonds of the American China Develop-

company, held by Belgians, remained unredeemed, it was

open to F.F.Chang to negotiate fora Fritish loan for the

struction of the Hankow Canton railway; moreover, that in

of the letter given to the Societé d'Etudes by H.F.

ng on 26th July 1898 relative to an alleged preferential

ht to the Hankow Canton Railway, the Chinese Government

debarred from entering upon negotiations with Pritich

italists. This protest would appear to have caused .E.

ng to reconsider his intention to raise a foreign loan.

Referring to the Pelgian protest it is to be observed

that the alleged preferential right given by F.E.Sheng in

letter referred to, was specifically stated to be effective

y in case the American China Development Company's pro-

ional contract "should not become a definitive one" →

ich it did - and (2) that in the agreement made between

.Chang and the American China Development Company on

August 1905 for repurchase of the Syndicate's construc-

n rights, it is clearly stated that, notwithstanding the

At that bonds for $2,222,000 (gold) had been already

d by the syndicate and were then outstanding, the Chinese

ernment should reenter absolutely upon all its rights and

ivileges in connection with this railway, admitting only

@liability to pay the interest and princip 1 of the anid

ads whenever due. The American China Development Company's

ts and powers were therefore definitely restored to

China

Comments

Approved members can add comments, bookmarks, and private notes.

No comments yet.

Private Research Note

Private notes are available after approval.